There wasn't anything dumb about it. They're living in fear of receiving life-saving medicine, so instead of making the choice on their own when all of the evidence proves them wrong, they need it given to them whether they want it or not so we experience fewer outbreaks of deadly, preventable disease and herd immunity can be re-established. The whole argument of "well if they did cause autism you're forcing them to have autism" is a poor one. They don't cause autism. They won't cause autism. The chance of autism shouldn't be a factor in t...

"if they did" But they don't. They never have and never will. A healthy nation is a higher priority than letting people live in fear and die painful deaths to completely preventable diseases. They will all see that they do not cause autism and the anti-vax movement can end. I agree, I was just attempting to point out how dumb that one point was. I agree with you overall though [quote=@16837996 " if they did we shouldn't force it upon people because it saves their lives." Are you even reading what you're typing? Well there are many p...

Yes, they should be required. Think vaccines cause autism? Too bad, we're saving your life anyway. Horrible point, although they do not cause autism, if they did we shouldn't force it upon people because it saves their lives. At that level the downsides would outweigh the upsides

I say there should be harsh sentences if they can prove it's false, with very concrete evidence, if they can't prove it right or wrong then no punishment. Although now some people can falsely accuse rape and get away with it, it solves the major issues, such as people entirely lacking the incentive to report rapes out of fear and the falsely accused still having a ruined reputation.

https://gyazo.com/d309582804c3bb4b2dc7f9536573caef https://img.ifcdn.com/videos/41c6045f9584b13fb9230d46b4bb77a6b30fe5b2bcb3be2dd95f6b1ab11b2c1d_1.mp4 Thoughts? Are you not 13? You are aware there are rules for browsing if you're under 18. OK well back on topic, this is literally the least credible /pol/ thread I've ever seen. OP said something that sounds plausible and would be good for Trump if true, and hoped that the underage influx from r/the_donald would bite. The poster is literally from Chile, doing anything involving that thre...

My replies are in purple The problem with refugees and the refugee crises is far greater than the risk of terrorism. The cost of supporting these refugees is very high, and the US is already screwed in terms of how much debt they owe. It would be better to build safe zones in the Middle East. Article 14 - Universal Declaration Of Human Rights Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. You forgot part 2 "2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from ...

snip Well a few things, first of all, the ban on immigrants is after all until we can figure out how to tell who is and isn't bad. Although terrorism is not a huge risk, Muslim immigrants tend to bring other issues other than just terrorism. Look at Sweden, for example, which has had a rise in rapes by 500% since they started letting immigrants in. When Muslims go to other countries many other issues arise other than terrorism, although terrorism still does happen. Even if the rate of terrorism is low, it is still a preventable risk. I co...

If Trump can win Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida, as well as Romney's states he could possibly win. I currently don't see Trump winning. I think he may still be able to turn it around at the debate. I hope he can :/2 I don't see him turning it around in the debates. Clinton is an establishment politician who has more experience debating. Trump could hammer Clinton on the economy in the debate, but I don't see him doing that now, so I doubt he'll do it in the debates. I could be wrong, but it looks like the debates will help Clinton mo...

However, we haven't even seen a huge gulf state attack yet. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30 There were some attacks in Saudi Arabia, but they weren't particularly major. "2016.07.03 Iraq, Karrada 308 deaths 246 injured 'Fedayeen suicide bomber detonates in a shopping mall packed with Shiites, slaughtering over three hundred, including many children.'" The attacks are very major just they're so common the news doesn't report them as there are so many. Iraq is not a Gulf State. Minor footnote, but heart goe...

However, we haven't even seen a huge gulf state attack yet. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30 There were some attacks in Saudi Arabia, but they weren't particularly major. "2016.07.03 Iraq, Karrada 308 deaths 246 injured 'Fedayeen suicide bomber detonates in a shopping mall packed with Shiites, slaughtering over three hundred, including many children.'" The attacks are very major just they're so common the news doesn't report them as there are so many.